SOC 2 Statistics: The Definitive Roundup
Every week, clients ask us some version of the same question: how does our compliance program compare?
Every week, clients ask us some version of the same question: how does our compliance program compare? After advising dozens of companies through SOC 2 — from seed-stage startups to mature enterprises — we have accumulated a detailed picture of what costs, timelines, adoption rates, audit findings, and market trends actually look like across the industry. This page is our master reference: the SOC 2 data points we use internally when designing compliance programs, organized by category and updated regularly. Whether you are building a business case for SOC 2 investment, benchmarking your program against industry averages, or planning strategically around compliance, this is the resource we point clients to first.
Cost Statistics
SOC 2 compliance costs vary significantly by company size, scope, audit type, and compliance maturity. What we tell clients is that the total number matters less than understanding where the money goes — and where you can control it.
First-Year Costs
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Average first-year SOC 2 total cost | $40,000-$150,000 | Includes auditor fees, GRC platform, consulting, internal labor, and remediation |
| Auditor fee range (Type I) | $15,000-$50,000 | Varies by auditor tier, company complexity, and scope |
| Auditor fee range (Type II) | $20,000-$80,000 | Higher than Type I due to observation period testing |
| GRC platform annual cost | $8,000-$60,000 | Based on headcount and selected framework count |
| Consulting cost (readiness assessment) | $3,000-$30,000 | Optional; higher for organizations requiring extensive gap remediation |
| Internal labor cost (first year) | $10,000-$100,000 | Based on compliance lead time plus engineering, HR, and IT support hours |
Cost by Company Size
| Company Size | Typical First-Year Cost | Ongoing Annual Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Startup (under 50 employees) | $35,000-$80,000 | $30,000-$65,000 |
| Growth stage (50-200 employees) | $60,000-$150,000 | $50,000-$120,000 |
| Mid-market (200-1,000 employees) | $100,000-$230,000 | $85,000-$190,000 |
| Enterprise (1,000+ employees) | $150,000-$400,000+ | $130,000-$350,000 |
Three-Year Total Cost of Ownership
| Company Size | 3-Year TCO Range |
|---|---|
| Startup | $90,000-$230,000 |
| Growth stage | $180,000-$400,000 |
| Mid-market | $300,000-$610,000 |
| Enterprise | $475,000-$1,100,000+ |
In our experience, the three-year view is the right lens for evaluating SOC 2 investment. First-year costs are always the highest due to remediation and setup. By year two, most organizations see a meaningful drop as processes mature and evidence collection becomes routine.
Cost Reduction Factors
| Factor | Typical Impact |
|---|---|
| Using a GRC platform vs. manual compliance | 50-70% reduction in internal labor hours |
| Choosing a specialized SOC 2 auditor vs. Big 4 firm | $10,000-$50,000+ savings on auditor fees |
| Starting with Security criterion only vs. multiple criteria | 30-40% lower first-year cost |
| Having existing security controls (SSO, MFA, logging) in place | 20-30% reduction in remediation costs |
| Multi-year auditor contract | 5-15% discount on annual auditor fees |
Timeline Statistics
SOC 2 audit timelines depend on report type, company size, and preparation level. We recommend using these ranges for internal planning and adding buffer for the common delays listed below.
Type I Timeline
| Phase | Typical Duration |
|---|---|
| Readiness and implementation | 4-12 weeks |
| Auditor engagement and scheduling | 2-4 weeks |
| Audit fieldwork | 1-3 weeks |
| Report delivery | 1-3 weeks |
| Total (start to report) | 8-22 weeks |
Accelerated timeline for well-prepared organizations: as few as 6-8 weeks. We have seen this with clients who already had strong security fundamentals — SSO, MFA, logging, and documented policies — before starting the formal SOC 2 process.
Type II Timeline
| Phase | Typical Duration |
|---|---|
| Readiness and implementation | 4-16 weeks |
| Observation period | 6-12 months |
| Audit fieldwork | 2-4 weeks |
| Report delivery | 2-4 weeks |
| Total (start to report) | 9-18 months |
Timeline by Company Size
| Company Size | Typical Time to First Type I | Typical Time to First Type II |
|---|---|---|
| Startup | 6-12 weeks | 9-14 months |
| Growth stage | 8-16 weeks | 10-16 months |
| Mid-market | 10-20 weeks | 12-18 months |
| Enterprise | 12-24 weeks | 14-20 months |
Common Delays
| Delay Factor | Impact on Timeline |
|---|---|
| Auditor scheduling conflict | +2-6 weeks |
| Policy approval delays | +1-3 weeks |
| Incomplete employee training | +1-2 weeks |
| Integration configuration issues | +1-3 weeks |
| Missing vendor security documentation | +1-3 weeks |
| Significant remediation requirements | +2-8 weeks |
What we see most often is that policy approval delays and auditor scheduling conflicts are the two biggest timeline risks that teams underestimate. We recommend starting auditor selection during week two of readiness — not after readiness is complete.
Adoption Statistics
SOC 2 adoption continues to grow as enterprise procurement increasingly requires security attestation from technology vendors. In our practice, we are seeing companies pursue SOC 2 earlier in their lifecycle than ever before — often pre-Series A.
Market Adoption Trends
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Estimated SOC 2 reports issued annually | 10,000-15,000+ (growing year over year) |
| Growth in SOC 2 audit volume (annual) | 20-30% year-over-year increase |
| Percentage of enterprise RFPs requiring SOC 2 | 70-85% for B2B SaaS vendors |
| Most common first framework for US SaaS startups | SOC 2 (followed by ISO 27001) |
| Average company size at first SOC 2 audit | 30-80 employees |
| Percentage of SOC 2 organizations using GRC platforms | 70-80% (up from approximately 40% in 2020) |
Adoption by Industry
| Industry | SOC 2 Adoption Level | Typical Driver |
|---|---|---|
| B2B SaaS / Cloud services | Very high | Enterprise customer requirements |
| Fintech / Financial services | Very high | Regulatory expectations and institutional buyer requirements |
| Healthtech | High | Hospital and health plan procurement requirements (alongside HIPAA) |
| Data analytics / AI | High | Data processing trust requirements |
| Infrastructure / DevOps tools | High | Developer ecosystem expectations |
| Professional services (tech) | Moderate | Client trust and competitive differentiation |
| E-commerce platforms | Moderate | Merchant and partner trust requirements |
Trust Service Criteria Selection
| Criteria Combination | Approximate Usage |
|---|---|
| Security only | 55-65% of SOC 2 audits |
| Security + Availability | 20-25% |
| Security + Availability + Confidentiality | 8-12% |
| Security + Availability + Processing Integrity + Confidentiality | 3-5% |
| All five criteria | 2-4% |
Security is the only mandatory criterion, and the majority of organizations — particularly those pursuing SOC 2 for the first time — include only Security. We generally recommend starting with Security only unless your customers or contracts specifically require additional criteria. Availability is the most common addition, typically for SaaS platforms with uptime commitments.
Audit Findings Statistics
Understanding common audit findings helps organizations prepare effectively and avoid the most frequent exceptions. In our experience, most first-year exceptions are preventable with the right preparation and monitoring cadence.
Most Common Exceptions
| Finding Category | Frequency | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incomplete access reviews | Very common | Quarterly access reviews missed or not documented during the observation period |
| Employee training gaps | Very common | One or more employees did not complete security awareness training |
| Missing or late evidence | Common | Gaps in evidence collection during the observation period |
| Change management deviations | Common | Changes deployed without documented approval or review |
| Vendor management gaps | Common | Critical vendors without current security assessments on file |
| Endpoint non-compliance | Moderate | Employee devices without required security configurations |
| Incident response testing gaps | Moderate | No documented tabletop exercise during the observation period |
| Risk assessment not completed | Moderate | Annual risk assessment missing or incomplete |
Exception Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Percentage of first-year Type II audits with at least one exception | 50-70% |
| Average number of exceptions in first-year Type II | 2-5 |
| Percentage of mature (year 3+) programs with zero exceptions | 40-55% |
| Most common exception category | Access management (access reviews, provisioning/deprovisioning) |
| Percentage of exceptions related to manual processes | 60-75% |
The high percentage of manual-process-related exceptions underscores the value of GRC platform automation — automated evidence collection and monitoring significantly reduce the risk of evidence gaps and missed recurring tasks. What we tell our clients is that if you are doing access reviews, training tracking, or evidence collection manually, those are exactly the controls most likely to produce exceptions.
GRC Platform Market Statistics
The GRC platform market has grown rapidly alongside SOC 2 adoption, with platforms becoming the standard tool for compliance management.
Market Overview
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Estimated GRC platform market size (SOC 2 segment) | $1-2 billion+ |
| Annual market growth rate | 25-35% |
| Number of GRC platforms supporting SOC 2 | 30+ |
| Percentage of SOC 2 organizations using a platform | 70-80% |
Platform Adoption
| Platform | Approximate Market Position |
|---|---|
| Vanta | Largest customer base; 375+ integrations |
| Drata | Strong adoption among startups; known for UI design |
| Secureframe | Strong multi-framework support; 300+ integrations |
| Sprinto | Growing adoption, particularly in international markets |
| Thoropass | Integrated audit and platform offering |
| AuditBoard | Enterprise-focused GRC platform |
Platform Impact on Compliance
| Metric | With GRC Platform | Without GRC Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Internal labor hours for Type II | 200-400 hours/year | 500-1,000+ hours/year |
| Time to initial compliance | 2-4 months | 4-8+ months |
| Audit fieldwork duration | 1-3 weeks | 3-6 weeks |
| Evidence collection effort | 70-80% automated | 90-100% manual |
| Annual compliance maintenance | 5-10 hours/week | 15-25+ hours/week |
Multi-Framework Statistics
Many organizations pursue SOC 2 alongside additional compliance frameworks. We recommend sequencing frameworks rather than pursuing everything simultaneously — SOC 2 first, then layering on additional frameworks where the control overlap is highest.
Framework Combinations
| Combination | Approximate Prevalence |
|---|---|
| SOC 2 only | 45-55% |
| SOC 2 + ISO 27001 | 20-25% |
| SOC 2 + HIPAA | 10-15% |
| SOC 2 + PCI DSS | 5-8% |
| SOC 2 + ISO 27001 + HIPAA | 5-8% |
| SOC 2 + three or more frameworks | 5-10% |
Multi-Framework Efficiency
| Adding Framework to SOC 2 | Incremental Cost | Control Overlap |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | +30-50% over SOC 2 alone | 60-70% |
| HIPAA | +20-35% over SOC 2 alone | 70-80% |
| PCI DSS | +40-60% over SOC 2 alone | 50-60% |
| GDPR | +15-25% over SOC 2 alone | 50-60% |
The control overlap percentages are why we encourage clients to think about multi-framework strategy from day one, even if they are only pursuing SOC 2 initially. Designing controls with ISO 27001 or HIPAA alignment in mind from the start saves significant rework later.
Business Impact Statistics
SOC 2 compliance delivers measurable business impact beyond security improvement. This is the section we point to most often when helping clients build their internal business case.
Sales Impact
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Average reduction in security review timeline with SOC 2 report | 50-75% (from 4-8 weeks to 1-2 weeks) |
| Percentage of enterprise deals where SOC 2 is a prerequisite | 60-80% in B2B SaaS |
| Revenue at risk from lacking SOC 2 (per blocked deal) | Varies; single enterprise deals often exceed annual SOC 2 cost |
| Deal acceleration from faster security reviews | 4-6 weeks earlier revenue recognition per deal |
SOC 2 Cost as Percentage of Revenue
| Company Stage | Typical Annual Revenue | SOC 2 as % of Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Seed / early-stage | $500K-$3M | 2-14% |
| Growth | $3M-$20M | 0.6-4% |
| Mid-market | $20M-$100M | 0.1-1% |
| Enterprise | $100M+ | Less than 0.35% |
SOC 2 cost as a percentage of revenue decreases rapidly with company growth, making the ROI increasingly favorable for growth-stage and larger organizations. In our experience, this is the single most effective data point for getting CFO buy-in: by mid-market stage, SOC 2 costs less than one percent of revenue while protecting access to the majority of enterprise pipeline.
Operational Impact
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Reduction in security questionnaire response time | 40-60% |
| Improvement in security posture (self-reported) | 70-85% of organizations report measurable improvement |
| Reduction in security incidents post-SOC 2 implementation | Varies; organizations report improved detection and response capabilities |
Auditor Market Statistics
The SOC 2 audit market includes firms ranging from boutique specialists to Big 4 accounting firms. We help our clients navigate this landscape to find the right fit for their size, industry, and timeline.
Auditor Landscape
| Auditor Tier | Number of Firms | Typical Fee Range | Market Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Big 4 (Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG) | 4 | $80,000-$300,000+ | 10-15% of SOC 2 audits |
| Mid-tier / national firms | 15-25 | $40,000-$100,000 | 25-35% |
| Specialized SOC 2 firms | 30-50 | $20,000-$60,000 | 35-45% |
| Boutique / regional firms | 100+ | $15,000-$40,000 | 15-20% |
Auditor Selection Factors
| Factor | Percentage of Organizations Citing as Important |
|---|---|
| Industry experience | 75-85% |
| Price | 70-80% |
| Audit timeline / availability | 65-75% |
| GRC platform familiarity | 55-65% |
| Firm reputation | 50-60% |
| Communication quality | 50-60% |
Key Takeaways
- We see first-year SOC 2 costs range from $35,000 for startups to $400,000+ for enterprises, with three-year TCO ranging from $90,000 to over $1 million — plan around the three-year view, not just year one
- Time to first Type I report ranges from six to twenty-two weeks; Type II from nine to eighteen months — start auditor selection early to avoid the most common delay
- Seventy to eighty-five percent of enterprise B2B SaaS RFPs now require SOC 2, making it a revenue enabler, not just a cost center
- Fifty to seventy percent of first-year Type II audits have at least one exception — we recommend focusing preparation on access reviews and employee training, the two most common finding areas
- GRC platforms reduce internal labor by fifty to seventy percent; if you are managing compliance manually, that is the single highest-impact investment to make
- We recommend starting with Security-only scope (fifty-five to sixty-five percent of audits follow this path) and adding criteria only when customer contracts require them
- SOC 2 reduces security review timelines by fifty to seventy-five percent, directly accelerating enterprise deal cycles — frame your business case around deals at risk, not abstract compliance value
- Specialized SOC 2 audit firms handle thirty-five to forty-five percent of the market and offer the best balance of expertise and pricing for most organizations we advise
Frequently Asked Questions
How often are these statistics updated?
What we tell clients is to treat the cost ratios and timeline ranges as relatively stable — those shift gradually. This page is reviewed and updated quarterly as new data becomes available from GRC platform vendor reports, CPA firm surveys, and our own client engagements. Adoption percentages and market size estimates move more frequently as the SOC 2 market continues expanding. We recommend checking back quarterly if you are using these figures for budgeting or strategic planning.
Where do these statistics come from?
Based on what we see, the most reliable SOC 2 data comes from cross-referencing multiple sources rather than relying on any single report. We aggregate from GRC platform vendor reports (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe), industry analyst publications, CPA firm survey data, AICPA market reports, and our own proprietary research across SOC 2 engagements. Where specific sources are available, they are noted. Many figures represent ranges derived from cross-referencing rather than single definitive data points.
How does our company compare to these benchmarks?
In our experience, the company size segmentation is the most useful starting comparison point. If your SOC 2 costs, timeline, or exception count fall within the ranges listed for your company size, your program is operating within normal parameters. If your costs are significantly above the ranges, we recommend evaluating whether your scope is broader than typical, your auditor fees are above market, or your internal labor investment is higher than necessary. GRC platform automation is the single most effective lever for bringing costs and timelines into benchmark ranges — that is the first place we look when helping clients optimize.
Are SOC 2 adoption rates still growing?
Based on what we see across our client base, yes — and the growth is accelerating. SOC 2 audit volume continues to grow at twenty to thirty percent annually as enterprise procurement teams increasingly standardize on SOC 2 as a vendor security requirement. Three factors are driving the growth: more enterprises requiring SOC 2 from their vendors, earlier-stage companies pursuing SOC 2 (pre-Series A in some cases), and expansion into industries beyond traditional B2B SaaS — healthcare, fintech, data analytics, and AI are all seeing significant uptake.
What is the most important statistic for building a SOC 2 business case?
What we recommend to every client building an internal business case is to lead with the revenue impact: sixty to eighty percent of enterprise B2B SaaS RFPs require SOC 2, meaning a single blocked enterprise deal often exceeds the entire annual SOC 2 cost. Frame the business case around specific deals at risk rather than abstract compliance benefits — that is what gets executive buy-in. The cost-as-percentage-of-revenue data (less than one percent for mid-market and enterprise companies) reinforces that SOC 2 is a modest investment relative to the revenue it protects and enables.
Agency Team
Agency Insights
Expert guidance on cybersecurity compliance from Agency's advisory team.
LinkedIn