A-LIGN vs Coalfire: SOC 2 Audit Firm Comparison
Choosing between A-LIGN and Coalfire is a decision we help mid-market and enterprise clients navigate regularly.
Choosing between A-LIGN and Coalfire is a decision we help mid-market and enterprise clients navigate regularly. Both are among the largest national audit and compliance firms serving the SOC 2 market, but they approach it differently: Coalfire has deep roots in government and federal compliance (FedRAMP, CMMC, and federal security assessments) alongside its commercial SOC 2 practice, while A-LIGN has built a broad multi-framework compliance practice with particular strength across SOC 2, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, and HITRUST. For compliance leaders at companies with two hundred or more employees evaluating premium audit firms, understanding how these firms differ in methodology, industry specialization, pricing, and audit experience is critical to making the right choice.
This guide compares A-LIGN and Coalfire across firm profile, audit methodology, pricing, industry specialization, GRC platform partnerships, and overall audit experience.
Firm Profiles
A-LIGN Overview
A-LIGN is a compliance and security services firm that has grown into one of the largest providers of SOC 2, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HITRUST, and related compliance audits in the United States. The firm positions itself as a multi-framework compliance partner, offering audit and assessment services across a broad range of security and privacy frameworks.
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Firm size | Large — hundreds of compliance professionals |
| Primary services | SOC 2, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HITRUST, FedRAMP, penetration testing, privacy assessments |
| Market position | Broad multi-framework compliance; strong in commercial SaaS and technology |
| Geographic presence | National with multiple offices; serves clients across the US and internationally |
| Client base | Ranges from growth-stage companies to large enterprises |
| Framework breadth | One of the broadest framework offerings among compliance-focused firms |
Coalfire Overview
Coalfire is a cybersecurity advisory and assessment firm with deep expertise in government security, cloud security, and compliance. The firm is particularly well-known for its FedRAMP assessment practice and cloud security advisory, alongside its commercial SOC 2 and compliance audit services.
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Firm size | Large — significant team of cybersecurity and compliance professionals |
| Primary services | SOC 2, FedRAMP, CMMC, cloud security assessment, penetration testing, advisory |
| Market position | Strong in government/federal compliance and cloud security; growing commercial practice |
| Geographic presence | National with multiple offices; strong presence in government-heavy markets |
| Client base | Government contractors, cloud service providers, technology companies, enterprises |
| Framework breadth | Deep in government frameworks (FedRAMP, CMMC); broad commercial coverage |
Comparison Framework
Audit Methodology
| Dimension | A-LIGN | Coalfire |
|---|---|---|
| Approach to scoping | Structured scoping process across frameworks; experienced in complex multi-framework scoping | Thorough scoping with emphasis on understanding technology architecture and deployment models |
| Testing methodology | Standardized testing procedures across frameworks; efficiency from repeatable processes | Technical depth in testing; cloud security expertise informs testing approach |
| Use of technology | GRC platform integration for evidence collection; adapts to client platform | Technology-forward approach; strong understanding of cloud architectures during audit |
| Multi-framework efficiency | Strong — firm's breadth across frameworks enables combined audits that reduce overall effort | Capable of multi-framework delivery; particular efficiency when combining SOC 2 with FedRAMP |
| Communication during audit | Regular status updates; structured communication cadence | Strong technical communication; audit teams often include deep technical expertise |
| Report quality | Professional, detailed reports with clear control descriptions and test results | Detailed reports; particularly thorough system descriptions for complex environments |
Industry Specialization
| Industry | A-LIGN Strength | Coalfire Strength | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS / technology | Strong — broad SaaS client base across sizes | Strong — cloud-native technology focus | Both firms serve SaaS well; A-LIGN may have more startup experience |
| Government / FedRAMP | Capable | Very strong — one of the leading FedRAMP 3PAOs | Coalfire is the clear choice if FedRAMP is a primary requirement |
| Financial services / fintech | Strong — PCI DSS and SOC 2 combined expertise | Capable | A-LIGN's PCI DSS depth adds value for fintech |
| Healthcare / HITRUST | Strong — significant HITRUST assessment practice | Capable | A-LIGN has deeper HITRUST-specific expertise |
| Cloud infrastructure | Strong | Very strong — deep cloud security advisory and assessment | Coalfire's cloud security heritage is a differentiator |
| Defense / CMMC | Growing | Strong — established CMMC assessment practice | Coalfire leads in defense and CMMC |
Pricing Comparison
| Pricing Factor | A-LIGN | Coalfire | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II (mid-market, 200-500 employees) | $40,000-$80,000 | $45,000-$90,000 | Both firms price at the premium tier; Coalfire may be slightly higher for complex environments |
| SOC 2 Type II (enterprise, 500+ employees) | $60,000-$120,000+ | $65,000-$130,000+ | Enterprise pricing varies significantly based on scope complexity |
| Multi-framework bundle (SOC 2 + ISO 27001) | Competitive bundled pricing; framework breadth creates bundling opportunities | Competitive bundled pricing; particularly efficient for SOC 2 + FedRAMP | Both firms offer bundled pricing; A-LIGN may have more bundle combinations |
| Penetration testing (add-on) | Available as part of comprehensive engagement | Available; integrated with security assessment services | Both firms offer pen testing; often bundled with audit engagement |
| Pricing model | Typically fixed-fee based on scope | Typically fixed-fee based on scope | Both use scope-based pricing; request detailed proposals for comparison |
| Pricing transparency | Clear proposal process with detailed scope and pricing | Detailed proposal process | Both firms provide detailed proposals; negotiation common at enterprise level |
Scorecard Comparison
| Dimension | A-LIGN (1-10) | Coalfire (1-10) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 expertise | 9 | 8 | Both strong; A-LIGN has broader SOC 2 volume |
| Multi-framework capability | 9 | 8 | A-LIGN covers more commercial frameworks; Coalfire adds government frameworks |
| Government/federal compliance | 7 | 10 | Coalfire is a clear leader in FedRAMP and government compliance |
| Cloud security depth | 8 | 9 | Coalfire's cloud security heritage provides deeper technical assessment |
| SaaS industry experience | 9 | 8 | A-LIGN has broader SaaS client base; Coalfire growing |
| Pricing competitiveness | 7 | 6 | Both premium; A-LIGN may offer slightly more competitive pricing for standard engagements |
| GRC platform familiarity | 8 | 7 | A-LIGN has broader GRC platform partnerships; Coalfire growing |
| Communication quality | 8 | 8 | Both firms maintain strong communication throughout engagements |
| Report turnaround time | 8 | 7 | Both deliver within industry norms; A-LIGN may have slight edge on turnaround |
| Advisory value beyond audit | 7 | 9 | Coalfire's advisory practice provides deeper security guidance beyond compliance |
Strengths and Limitations
A-LIGN Strengths
- Broad multi-framework coverage (SOC 2, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HITRUST, FedRAMP, privacy) enables efficient combined audits
- Large SOC 2 practice with experience across company sizes from growth-stage to enterprise
- Strong GRC platform partnerships with familiarity across major platforms (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe)
- Structured, efficient audit methodology developed through high-volume compliance practice
- Framework bundling options that can reduce total compliance assessment costs
A-LIGN Limitations
- Premium pricing may exceed budgets for smaller companies (better suited for 200+ employee organizations)
- Less specialized than boutique firms for specific niche industries
- Large firm dynamics mean engagement team composition matters — quality can vary by specific team
- Government compliance (FedRAMP, CMMC) is not the firm's primary heritage
Coalfire Strengths
- Unmatched FedRAMP and government compliance expertise as one of the leading 3PAOs
- Deep cloud security knowledge that informs more thorough technical assessments
- Strong advisory practice that provides security guidance beyond compliance checkbox auditing
- Excellent for organizations that need both commercial compliance (SOC 2) and government compliance (FedRAMP, CMMC)
- Technical depth of audit teams — Coalfire auditors often have deeper technical backgrounds
Coalfire Limitations
- Premium pricing that reflects the firm's market position; may be higher than alternatives for standard SOC 2 engagements
- Government compliance heritage may not align with needs of purely commercial SaaS companies
- May have less volume in startup-focused SOC 2 compared to firms that specialize in the growth-stage market
- HITRUST and PCI DSS practices, while capable, are not the firm's primary differentiator
Decision Framework
Which Firm Fits Your Profile
| Company Profile | Recommended Firm | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-market SaaS (200-500 employees), SOC 2 + ISO 27001 | A-LIGN | Broader multi-framework expertise; efficient bundled audits; strong SaaS experience |
| Cloud service provider needing SOC 2 + FedRAMP | Coalfire | Leading FedRAMP 3PAO; combined SOC 2 + FedRAMP efficiency |
| Fintech needing SOC 2 + PCI DSS | A-LIGN | Deeper PCI DSS practice alongside SOC 2 |
| Healthcare tech needing SOC 2 + HITRUST | A-LIGN | Significant HITRUST assessment practice |
| Defense contractor needing SOC 2 + CMMC | Coalfire | Established CMMC assessment practice |
| Enterprise with complex cloud architecture | Coalfire | Cloud security depth informs more thorough technical assessment |
| Company wanting broadest framework coverage from one firm | A-LIGN | Widest range of compliance assessment services |
| Company prioritizing security advisory alongside audit | Coalfire | Stronger advisory practice beyond compliance assessment |
| Government technology company | Coalfire | Government compliance heritage and relationships |
Key Selection Questions
| Question | Why It Matters | How to Evaluate |
|---|---|---|
| What frameworks do we need beyond SOC 2? | Framework requirements drive firm selection — each firm has different strengths | Map your framework needs to each firm's specialization |
| Do we need FedRAMP or government compliance? | If yes, Coalfire has a significant advantage | Confirm FedRAMP 3PAO status and recent FedRAMP experience |
| What is our total compliance assessment budget? | Both firms are premium; pricing differences can be significant at scale | Request detailed proposals from both; compare total cost across all frameworks |
| How technically complex is our environment? | Complex environments benefit from Coalfire's technical depth | Evaluate audit team composition and technical expertise |
| Which GRC platform do we use? | Platform familiarity affects audit efficiency | Confirm that the firm's team has direct experience with your platform |
| What is our timeline? | Firm capacity and scheduling affect when your audit can begin | Confirm availability and expected start dates during proposal process |
GRC Platform Partnerships
Platform Familiarity
| Platform | A-LIGN Familiarity | Coalfire Familiarity |
|---|---|---|
| Vanta | Strong — extensive experience with Vanta's auditor portal | Growing — increasing familiarity as platform adoption grows |
| Drata | Strong — regular engagement through Drata's auditor portal | Growing |
| Secureframe | Familiar — works with Secureframe's evidence format | Familiar |
| Thoropass (formerly Laika) | Familiar | Familiar |
| Sprinto | Growing familiarity | Growing familiarity |
In our experience, both firms work effectively with major GRC platforms, but A-LIGN's higher volume of SOC 2 engagements across a broader client base means their teams have likely encountered more platforms in production environments.
The Audit Experience
What to Expect from Each Firm
| Phase | A-LIGN Experience | Coalfire Experience |
|---|---|---|
| Proposal and scoping | Structured proposal process with detailed scope definition; clear pricing | Thorough scoping with emphasis on understanding your technical architecture |
| Kickoff | Professional kickoff covering timeline, evidence requirements, and team introductions | Kickoff that often includes deeper technical discussion of your environment |
| Evidence collection | Efficient evidence review leveraging GRC platform portals; structured evidence request lists | Thorough evidence review; may include more technical depth in evidence requirements |
| Control owner interviews | Structured interviews covering control design and operation | Interviews that may include more technical probing based on Coalfire's security background |
| Findings communication | Clear communication of findings with remediation guidance | Findings communicated with both compliance and security context |
| Report delivery | Professional reports delivered within industry-standard timelines | Detailed reports with strong system descriptions for complex environments |
Key Takeaways
- A-LIGN and Coalfire are both premium, national compliance firms well-suited for mid-market and enterprise SOC 2 engagements — the choice between them depends primarily on your framework requirements, industry vertical, and whether you need government or commercial compliance expertise
- In our experience, A-LIGN offers the broadest multi-framework coverage among compliance-focused firms, making it the stronger choice for organizations needing SOC 2 combined with PCI DSS, HITRUST, ISO 27001, or multiple commercial frameworks from a single firm
- Coalfire is the clear leader for organizations needing FedRAMP, CMMC, or government compliance alongside SOC 2, with deep cloud security expertise that also benefits commercially-focused companies with complex cloud architectures
- Both firms price at the premium tier ($40,000-$130,000+ for SOC 2 Type II depending on size and complexity), with Coalfire sometimes pricing slightly higher for complex environments that benefit from its deeper technical assessment approach
- We recommend confirming specific GRC platform experience during the proposal process — while both firms are broadly familiar with major platforms, A-LIGN's higher SOC 2 volume provides broader exposure to diverse platforms
- We help our clients evaluate audit firm fit based on framework requirements, industry vertical, technical complexity, and total compliance program needs — ensuring the selected firm aligns with both current and anticipated compliance requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which firm is better for a first-time SOC 2 audit?
What we tell clients is that both firms can handle first-time SOC 2 engagements, but A-LIGN may have more experience with growth-stage companies doing their first audit given its broader SOC 2 practice volume. For first-time audits at companies with two hundred or more employees (which is the typical client size for both firms), either firm provides the experience and guidance needed. If you are a smaller company (under one hundred employees), we typically recommend firms that specialize in the startup SOC 2 market, such as KirkpatrickPrice, BARR Advisory, or Prescient Assurance.
Can we use the same firm for SOC 2 and FedRAMP?
Yes, and using a single firm for both can be significantly more efficient. Based on what we see with our government-adjacent clients, if you need both SOC 2 and FedRAMP, Coalfire is the strongest choice among these two firms — their FedRAMP 3PAO practice is one of the most established in the market, and combining SOC 2 and FedRAMP with the same firm creates efficiency in scoping, evidence collection, and audit team understanding of your environment. A-LIGN also offers FedRAMP services, but Coalfire's government compliance heritage makes it the more natural choice for this combination.
How do we negotiate pricing with premium firms?
The advice we give most often here is that premium firms like A-LIGN and Coalfire are most responsive to negotiation when you commit to multi-year engagements, bundle multiple frameworks, or provide early access to audit-ready evidence that reduces their effort. We recommend requesting proposals from both firms simultaneously — competitive quotes provide negotiation leverage. Be transparent about your budget constraints while demonstrating that your organization is well-prepared (GRC platform deployed, evidence organized, readiness assessment complete), which reduces the firm's perceived risk of scope expansion and enables more competitive pricing.
What if our company is too small for these firms?
A-LIGN and Coalfire primarily serve companies with two hundred or more employees, and their pricing reflects the premium service level they provide. If your company has fewer than one hundred employees, we typically recommend firms that specialize in the startup and growth-stage market: KirkpatrickPrice, BARR Advisory, Prescient Assurance, and Johanson Group offer strong SOC 2 expertise at price points better suited for smaller organizations. These firms provide equally valid SOC 2 reports — the AICPA standards are the same regardless of which firm performs the audit.
Agency Team
Agency Insights
Expert guidance on cybersecurity compliance from Agency's advisory team.
LinkedIn